<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21301089.post6035859412889766256..comments</id><updated>2008-02-04T17:32:24.897-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on MotherReader: Nonfiction vs. Historical Fiction, plus FOREWORD!</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.motherreader.com/feeds/6035859412889766256/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21301089/6035859412889766256/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.motherreader.com/2008/02/nonfiction-vs-historical-fiction-plus.html'/><author><name>MotherReader</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11274509991340797264</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21301089.post-6486817124994415002</id><published>2008-02-04T17:32:24.897-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-04T17:32:24.897-05:00</updated><title type='text'>MotherReader, momentarily setting aside the matter...</title><content type='html'>MotherReader, momentarily setting aside the matter of where to shelve a book, I've grown increasingly comfortable with the idea of children's and YA writers putting a creative spin on nonfiction topics in order to make those topics more accessible or meaningful -- except for one thing: What's the best way to convey to young readers that this is what the author has done? Any thoughts?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21301089/6035859412889766256/comments/default/6486817124994415002'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21301089/6035859412889766256/comments/default/6486817124994415002'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.motherreader.com/2008/02/nonfiction-vs-historical-fiction-plus.html?showComment=1202164344897#c6486817124994415002' title=''/><author><name>Chris Barton</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17891925951616484973</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.motherreader.com/2008/02/nonfiction-vs-historical-fiction-plus.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21301089.post-6035859412889766256' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21301089/posts/default/6035859412889766256' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21301089.post-2019686029140723648</id><published>2008-02-04T17:18:32.651-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-04T17:18:32.651-05:00</updated><title type='text'>I think the problem here is one of perspective. No...</title><content type='html'>I think the problem here is one of perspective. Nonfiction gets a bad wrap, and when authors try to make it interesting, and write narrative nonfiction, readers wonder where it fits. I for one am thrilled there are people out there trying to make this stuff more exciting and easier to read. Nonfiction doesn't have to read like a textbook to be informational.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21301089/6035859412889766256/comments/default/2019686029140723648'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21301089/6035859412889766256/comments/default/2019686029140723648'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.motherreader.com/2008/02/nonfiction-vs-historical-fiction-plus.html?showComment=1202163512651#c2019686029140723648' title=''/><author><name>Tricia</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18350907653629775293</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.motherreader.com/2008/02/nonfiction-vs-historical-fiction-plus.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21301089.post-6035859412889766256' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/21301089/posts/default/6035859412889766256' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>